Skip to content

API Security Statistics 2026

Suphi Cankurt

Written by Suphi Cankurt

Key Takeaways
  • 99% of organizations experienced API security problems in the past 12 months, with 34% involving sensitive data exposure (Salt Security 2025).
  • 52% of API breaches in 2025 were caused by broken authentication, and 59% of API vulnerabilities require no authentication at all (Wallarm 2025-2026).
  • 43% of all additions to CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog in 2025 were API-related, and 97% of API vulnerabilities can be exploited with a single request (Wallarm 2025).
  • 30-40% of an organization’s API footprint consists of shadow or zombie APIs, and only 15% of organizations have strong confidence in their API inventories (Salt Security 2025).
  • The API security market is growing from $1.32 billion (2025) to $4.60 billion by 2030 at 28.5% CAGR, driven by a 109% rise in API attacks (Mordor Intelligence).

API security is the discipline of protecting application programming interfaces from unauthorized access, data leaks, and abuse. APIs now handle roughly 83% of web traffic and are the primary way applications communicate — which also makes them the primary way attackers get in.

In 2025, 17% of all published security bulletins were API-related, making APIs one of the largest single vulnerability surfaces in modern software.

I collected data from 10 industry reports and surveys (Salt Security, Wallarm, OWASP, Verizon, Akamai, and others) published in 2024–2026. Every statistic links to its source.

For related data on broader vulnerability trends, see my Software Vulnerability Statistics page. For third-party and supply chain risk, see Supply Chain Attack Statistics .


Key statistics at a glance#

99%
Orgs with API Security Issues
Salt Security 2025
52%
API Breaches from Broken Auth
Wallarm 2025
43%
CISA KEVs That Are API-Related
Wallarm 2025
30-40%
Shadow/Zombie API Footprint
Industry Audits 2025
$4.6B
API Security Market by 2030
Mordor Intelligence
97%
API Vulns Exploitable in 1 Request
Wallarm 2025

API attack landscape#

APIs have become the preferred attack surface. Most API vulnerabilities are trivial to exploit, and attackers know it.

99% of organizations experienced API security issues in 12 months, with 95% of attacks from authenticated sources and 43% of CISA KEVs being API-related

How common are API security issues?#

  • 99% of organizations encountered API security problems in the past 12 months — Salt Security Q1 2025
  • 34% of these issues involved sensitive data exposure or a privacy incident — Salt Security 2025
  • 55% of organizations slowed the rollout of a new application due to API security concerns — Salt Security 2025
  • 95% of API attacks in the past 12 months originated from authenticated sources — Salt Security 2025
  • 98% of attack attempts targeted external-facing APIs — Salt Security 2025

How exploitable are API vulnerabilities?#

  • 43% of all additions to CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog in 2025 were API-related — Wallarm 2025
  • 97% of API vulnerabilities can be exploited with a single request — Wallarm 2025
  • 98% of API vulnerabilities are classified as either easy or trivial to exploit — Wallarm 2025
  • 59% of API vulnerabilities require no authentication at all — Wallarm 2026
  • APIs accounted for 11,053 of 67,058 published security bulletins in 2025 (17% of all reported vulnerabilities) — Wallarm 2026
  • Akamai reported a 32% uptick in API attacks exploiting OWASP API Security Top 10 risks — Akamai
  • Average daily API attacks per organization rose 113% YoY (from 121 to 258 attacks) — Akamai SOTI 2026
  • Over 40,000 API incidents recorded in H1 2025, averaging 220+ per day — Imperva/Thales 2025
  • Behavior-based attacks (unauthorized workflows) accounted for 61% of API attacks in 2025, up from 30% in 2024 — Akamai SOTI 2026

OWASP API Top 10 in practice#

The OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023 edition) lists the most critical API vulnerability categories. Wallarm’s breach analysis shows which ones actually get exploited.

API breach causes: broken authentication 52%, unsafe API consumption 27%, BOLA/BFLA 15%, other 6% from analysis of 60 incidents in 2025

What causes API breaches?#

  • Broken authentication caused 52% of 60 API breaches analyzed in 2025 — Wallarm 2026
  • Unsafe consumption of APIs accounted for 27% of breaches — Wallarm 2026
  • BOLA (Broken Object Level Authorization) and BFLA (Broken Function Level Authorization) account for hundreds of API vulnerabilities every quarter — Wallarm 2025
  • Breaches clustered by sector: Software (15%), AI platforms (15%), cybersecurity vendors (13%), SaaS (8%), automotive (7%), cloud services (7%) — Wallarm 2026

OWASP API Top 10 (2023 edition)#

  1. API1:2023 — Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA)
  2. API2:2023 — Broken Authentication
  3. API3:2023 — Broken Object Property Level Authorization
  4. API4:2023 — Unrestricted Resource Consumption
  5. API5:2023 — Broken Function Level Authorization (BFLA)
  6. API6:2023 — Unrestricted Access to Sensitive Business Flows
  7. API7:2023 — Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
  8. API8:2023 — Security Misconfiguration
  9. API9:2023 — Improper Inventory Management
  10. API10:2023 — Unsafe Consumption of APIs

Source: OWASP API Security Top 10 2023


Shadow and zombie APIs#

You can’t secure what you don’t know about. And most organizations don’t know about a third of their APIs.

API visibility problem: average enterprise manages 613 known APIs but 30-40% of actual footprint is shadow or zombie APIs, only 15% confident in inventory accuracy
  • Security audits show 30-40% of an organization’s actual API footprint consists of shadow APIs (undocumented) or zombie APIs (deprecated but still active) — AppSentinels 2025
  • Only 15% of organizations expressed strong confidence in the accuracy of their API inventories — Salt Security 2025
  • 34% of organizations lack visibility into sensitive data exposure through APIs — Salt Security 2025
  • Only 20% have measures in place to continuously monitor APIs — Salt Security 2025
  • 68% of organizations had shadow APIs they did not know about — Enterprise Management Associates/Salt
  • Only 6% of organizations have advanced API security programs — Salt Security 2025
  • One quarter of organizations experienced API growth exceeding 100% in the past year — Salt Security 2025

API breaches and cost#

API breaches hit some of the biggest companies and exposed millions of records. The costs add up fast.

Recent API breaches#

  • Dell (2024): attackers accessed 49 million customer records through an API vulnerability due to missing authorization checks — CybelAngel 2024
  • T-Mobile (2023): API breach impacted 37 million users, with remediation costs estimated around the multi-million-dollar industry average for breaches of that scale — Industry Analysis
  • Third-party API exposure at 700Credit exposed millions of records; weak API authentication at Qantas airlines fueled mass unauthorized access — Wallarm 2026

Business impact#

  • APIs account for approximately 83% of web traffic — Akamai/Industry
  • The estimated annual cost of vulnerable API interfaces and bot activity reaches $186 billionMordor Intelligence
  • 57% of organizations suffered an API-related data breach in the past two years, with 73% of those experiencing three or more incidents — Traceable 2025
  • 1 in 5 API security incidents cost over $500,000Kong 2025
  • Third-party involvement in breaches doubled to 30% in 2025 — Verizon DBIR 2025

AI and API security#

The intersection of AI and APIs is creating new attack surfaces. AI agents communicate through APIs, and AI-related vulnerabilities are overwhelmingly API-based.

  • 98.9% of AI-related vulnerabilities are API-related — Wallarm 2025

  • Salt Security reports 1/3 of respondents lack confidence in detecting AI-driven API threats — Salt Security 2025

  • 47% of respondents expressed concerns about securing AI-generated code that creates APIs — Salt Security 2025

  • Of 7,000+ MCP servers analyzed, 36.7% were vulnerable to SSRF — an API-level vulnerability — Wallarm 2026

  • AI vulnerabilities grew 398% YoY (from 439 to 2,185), with 36% involving APIs — Wallarm 2026

  • 62% of organizations adopted GenAI in API development; 65% believe it poses serious API security risk — Salt Security H2 2025 , Traceable 2025

For more on AI-specific risks, see my AI Security Statistics page.

The defensive side has its own AI story. Vendors are leaning hard into AI-augmented API discovery — Salt’s Illuminate engine, Wallarm’s ML detectors, and Akamai’s behavioral baselines all promote AI as the differentiator behind shadow-API discovery and BOLA detection. On the attack side, AI-generated API keys (committed to public repos by accident, then harvested at scale) are showing up in incident reports more often, and rogue MCP servers connected to AI agents are emerging as a new attack surface that traditional API security tools have not fully tokenized. Salt’s H2 2025 survey specifically calls out the gap: only 37% of organizations using agentic AI deploy dedicated API security, while 48% operate 6–20 different agent types. The implication for 2026 buyers is that “AI security” and “API security” will overlap more than they diverge — the same MCP server that exposes the agent’s data path is also the API that needs runtime detection.


API security testing#

Most organizations know API security is a problem. Fewer are actually testing.

  • 43% of organizations plan to implement API Posture Governance within 12 months — Salt Security 2025
  • Only 20% of organizations continuously monitor their APIs for security issues — Salt Security 2025
  • Traditional authentication-based defenses are insufficient — 95% of API attacks come from authenticated users — Salt Security 2025

The “API security testing” label often blurs nine distinct disciplines that buyers conflate: validation testing (request/response shape), functional testing (does the endpoint behave correctly), UI testing (the consuming client), load testing (volume and concurrency), runtime testing (live traffic monitoring), security testing (OWASP API Top 10 scans), penetration testing (manual or automated adversary simulation), fuzz testing (malformed input generation), and interoperability testing (third-party integrations). I cover the practical split in my API security testing guide , and the buyer signal that decides between automated-pentest tools and runtime platforms usually comes down to which subset of those nine your team needs.

Coverage statistics make the gap concrete. Salt’s most recent report frames continuous monitoring as a 20% baseline; the same dataset suggests roughly half of organizations rely on manual or quarterly testing cycles rather than CI-integrated checks, which is the dominant blind spot for fast-moving microservices estates. For tools that automate the testing portion of the lifecycle, see my API Security Tools comparison.


Market and predictions#

API security is one of the fastest-growing segments in cybersecurity, driven by both the API explosion and the attack growth that follows it.

  • API security market valued at $1.32 billion in 2025, projected to reach $4.60 billion by 2030 at 28.5% CAGRMordor Intelligence
  • API attacks increased 109% year-over-year — Mordor Intelligence
  • The average enterprise manages approximately 613 known APIs, but the real count is 30-40% higher when shadow APIs are included — Industry Audits 2025

Consolidation is the second story behind the headline CAGR. Two large acquisitions reshaped the vendor landscape in 2024 alone — Akamai bought Noname Security for $450 million in June, and Thales completed its acquisition of Imperva for $3.6 billion in December 2023 — and Harness folded Traceable into its DevSecOps suite in March 2025. The pattern points at API security collapsing into either WAF/CDN platforms (Akamai, Imperva, Cloudflare) or AppSec/DevSecOps suites (Harness), with the dedicated pure-play vendors competing on behavioral runtime, contract-first design, or bot defense. I track the resulting buyer landscape on my API security tools hub .

The other prediction worth flagging is the AI-driven attack vector. Industry reports increasingly call out AI-generated API key abuse, prompt-injection paths through APIs, and rogue MCP servers as the next phase of the OWASP API Top 10 — Wallarm’s 2026 ThreatStats report frames this as a 398% YoY growth in AI-related vulnerabilities, with 36% of those involving APIs. Expect the next two market refreshes to lean heavily on AI-related API risk as the dominant growth narrative.


My own research#

While I haven’t run an API-specific security study, several of my original research projects touch on API security.

Security headers and API endpoints#

In my Security Headers Adoption Study 2026 , I scanned 10,000 websites and found that many API-serving domains lack basic security headers. Only 27.3% deploy Content-Security-Policy, and CORS misconfigurations remain common — both directly relevant to API security posture.

Open source API security tools#

In my State of Open Source AppSec Tools 2026 , I evaluated API security tools including ZAP, Nuclei, and others. The API security category showed strong open-source tool health but lower adoption compared to SAST and SCA tools.

For a consolidated view of all original research, see my Application Security Statistics page.

Sources & methodology#

Every number on this page links to a published report or vendor study. If I cannot trace a statistic to a primary source, I do not include it.

Industry reports:

Market data:

Original research (AppSec Santa):

Frequently Asked Questions

What percentage of organizations experience API security issues?
According to Salt Security’s 2025 report, 99% of organizations encountered API security problems in the past 12 months. 34% of these involved sensitive data exposure or a privacy incident, and 55% slowed the rollout of a new application due to API security concerns.
What are the most common API vulnerabilities?
According to Wallarm’s analysis of 60 API breaches in 2025, broken authentication caused 52% of incidents. OWASP’s API Security Top 10 lists Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) as the #1 risk, followed by Broken Authentication and Broken Object Property Level Authorization. 59% of API vulnerabilities require no authentication at all.
What are shadow APIs and zombie APIs?
Shadow APIs are undocumented APIs deployed without the knowledge of security teams. Zombie APIs are deprecated APIs that remain active but unmaintained. Security audits show that 30-40% of an organization’s actual API footprint consists of shadow or zombie APIs, and only 15% of organizations have strong confidence in their API inventories.
How much does an API breach cost?
The global average cost of a data breach fell to $4.44 million in 2025 (down 9% from $4.88 million in 2024), according to IBM’s 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report. APIs now account for approximately 83% of web traffic, and 17% of all published security bulletins in 2025 were API-related — making APIs one of the largest single vulnerability surfaces in modern software.
How big is the API security market?
The API security market was valued at $1.32 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach $4.60 billion by 2030, growing at a 28.5% CAGR. This growth reflects the 109% rise in API attacks and mounting pressure to protect cloud-native microservices environments.
Can I cite these statistics?
Yes. Please cite as: ‘API Security Statistics 2026, AppSec Santa (appsecsanta.com).’ Every data point links to its original source.
Suphi Cankurt

Written & maintained by

Suphi Cankurt

Eight years on the vendor side of application-security sales — thousands of evaluations and demos. I started AppSec Santa in 2022 to put that insider view to work for buyers. Independent of any vendor, paid by none, and honest about what fits whom.