Home All Tools AI Security Tools
AI Security

10 Best AI Security Tools (2026)

Vendor-neutral comparison of 10 AI security tools for LLMs. Covers prompt injection, jailbreaks, and data leakage testing. Includes 7 open-source options.

Suphi Cankurt
Suphi Cankurt
10+ years in AppSec
Updated February 5, 2026
3 min read

What is AI Security?

As we integrate LLMs into our applications, traditional scanners are not enough.

We need specialized tools to test for hallucinations, prompt injection, jailbreaks, and data leakage.

The OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications provides a framework for understanding these risks.

According to OWASP’s 2025 Top 10 for LLM Applications, prompt injection is the #1 critical vulnerability, appearing in over 73% of production AI deployments assessed during security audits. Microsoft’s security research confirms that indirect prompt injection is one of the most widely-used attack techniques against AI systems. Research demonstrates that just five carefully crafted documents can manipulate AI responses 90% of the time through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) poisoning. Proactive security measures reduce incident response costs by 60-70% compared to reactive approaches, according to 2025 industry benchmarks.

The tools in this category help you proactively identify and mitigate AI-specific vulnerabilities before they reach production.

Advantages

  • • Tests for novel AI-specific risks
  • • Catches prompt injection and jailbreaks
  • • Essential for GenAI applications
  • • Most tools are free and open-source

Limitations

  • • Rapidly evolving field
  • • No established standards yet
  • • Limited coverage of all AI risk types
  • • Requires AI/ML expertise to interpret results

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications

These are the top risks you should test for when deploying LLM-based applications:

1

Prompt Injection

Malicious input that hijacks the model to perform unintended actions or reveal system prompts. The most critical and common LLM vulnerability.

2

Insecure Output Handling

LLM output used directly without validation, leading to XSS, SSRF, or code execution. Always sanitize LLM responses before rendering or executing them.

3

Training Data Poisoning

Malicious data introduced during training that causes the model to behave incorrectly. Relevant if you fine-tune models on external data.

4

Model Denial of Service

Attacks that consume excessive resources or cause the model to hang on crafted inputs. Rate limiting and input validation help mitigate this.

5

Supply Chain Vulnerabilities

Compromised models, datasets, or plugins from third-party sources. HiddenLayer and Protect AI Guardian scan for malicious models.

6

Sensitive Information Disclosure

Model leaking PII, credentials, or proprietary data from training or context. LLM Guard can anonymize PII in prompts and responses.


Quick Comparison of AI Security Tools

ToolUSPTypeLicense
Testing / Red Teaming (Open Source)
GarakNVIDIA's "Nmap for LLMs"TestingOpen Source
PyRITMicrosoft's AI red team frameworkTestingOpen Source
DeepTeam40+ attack simulations, OWASP coverageTestingOpen Source
PromptfooDeveloper CLI, CI/CD integrationTestingOpen Source
Runtime Protection (Open Source)
LLM GuardPII anonymization, content moderationRuntimeOpen Source
NeMo GuardrailsNVIDIA's programmable guardrailsRuntimeOpen Source
RebuffPrompt injection detection SDKRuntimeOpen Source
Commercial
Lakera GuardGandalf game creator, enterprise APIRuntimeFreemium
HiddenLayer AISecML model security platformBothCommercial
Protect AI GuardianML model scanning, 35+ formatsTestingCommercial

Testing Tools vs Runtime Protection

AI security tools fall into two categories: those that test your LLM before deployment, and those that protect it at runtime.

AspectTesting ToolsRuntime Protection
When it runsBefore deployment, in CI/CDAt runtime, on every request
PurposeFind vulnerabilities proactivelyBlock attacks in real-time
ExamplesGarak, PyRIT, Promptfoo, DeepTeamLakera Guard, LLM Guard, NeMo Guardrails
Performance impactNone (runs offline)Adds latency to requests
Best forDevelopment and QAProduction applications

My recommendation: Use both. Run testing tools like Garak, Promptfoo, or DeepTeam in CI/CD to catch issues early. Deploy runtime protection like Lakera Guard or LLM Guard for production applications that handle user input.


How to Choose an AI Security Tool

The AI security space is new, but these factors help narrow down your options:

1

Testing or Runtime Protection?

For vulnerability scanning before deployment, use Garak, PyRIT, Promptfoo, or DeepTeam. For runtime protection, use Lakera Guard, LLM Guard, or NeMo Guardrails.

2

LLM Provider Compatibility

Most tools work with any LLM via API. Garak, PyRIT, and NeMo Guardrails support local models. For ML model security scanning (not just LLMs), consider HiddenLayer or Protect AI Guardian.

3

Open-source vs Commercial

Seven tools are fully open-source: Garak, PyRIT, DeepTeam, LLM Guard, NeMo Guardrails, Rebuff, and Promptfoo (core). Lakera Guard offers a free tier. HiddenLayer and Protect AI Guardian are commercial for enterprise ML security.

4

CI/CD Integration

Promptfoo has first-class CI/CD support. Garak, PyRIT, and DeepTeam can run in CI with some setup. For runtime protection, LLM Guard and Lakera Guard are single API calls.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is AI Security?
AI Security refers to the practice of testing and protecting AI/ML systems, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), against attacks like prompt injection, jailbreaks, hallucinations, and data leakage. Traditional security scanners do not cover these AI-specific risks.
What is prompt injection?
Prompt injection is an attack where malicious input tricks an LLM into ignoring its instructions and performing unintended actions. For example, an attacker might embed hidden instructions in user input that causes the model to reveal system prompts or bypass safety filters.
What is the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications?
The OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications is a framework that identifies the top 10 security risks for LLM-based applications. It includes prompt injection, insecure output handling, training data poisoning, model denial of service, supply chain vulnerabilities, and more.
Do I need AI security tools if I use OpenAI or Anthropic APIs?
Yes. While API providers implement safety measures, they cannot protect against application-level vulnerabilities like prompt injection in your specific use case, data leakage through your prompts, or misuse of the model within your application context.
Which AI security tool should I start with?
Start with Garak if you want comprehensive vulnerability scanning. It is free, backed by NVIDIA, and covers the widest range of attack types. For CI/CD integration, try Promptfoo.

Explore Other Categories

AI Security covers one aspect of application security. Browse other categories in our complete tools directory.

Suphi Cankurt
Written by
Suphi Cankurt

Suphi Cankurt is an application security enthusiast based in Helsinki, Finland. He reviews and compares 129 AppSec tools across 10 categories on AppSec Santa. Learn more.